Physical Education A-Level
Linear versus curved arousal–performance relationships
What Linear versus curved arousal–performance relationships means in Physical Education A-Level, as defined for AQA.
Definition of Linear versus curved arousal–performance relationships
Check what you remember
Read the wording for your board, then hide it and explain Linear versus curved arousal–performance relationships in your own words. Rough notes are fine. This is a self-check, with no mark or grade.
Reference: AQA
Drive theory predicts a straight-line increase in performance with arousal, whereas inverted U theory predicts a smooth curve that rises to an optimum then falls.
Topics that use Linear versus curved arousal–performance relationships
- Arousal (AQA A-Level)
Related terms
- Optimal arousal as a zone rather than a point
- Sudden collapse versus gradual decline
- Task and individual influences on optimal arousal
- Arousal
- Catastrophe theory
- Clear goals and immediate feedback
- Drive theory
- Effortless and automatic execution
Using Linear versus curved arousal–performance relationships in the exam
Check the command word and mark scheme for your exact question. After comparing your explanation with the reference, use the term in an answer on the linked topic. This practice does not predict an exam mark.
Practise Physical Education questions
Create a free account to answer exam-style questions on this topic and get feedback on your answers.
Start free
All Physical Education A-Level termsA week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge