Paper 2, Option 2D.2: The unification of Germany, c1840–71 - 4 Prussia and the Klein- deutschland solution, 1866–71 — Edexcel A-Level History
Verified courseTeaching note checked against the official specification.
Paper 2, Option 2D.2: The unification of Germany, c1840–71 - 4 Prussia and the Klein- deutschland solution, 1866–71 explained
Paper 2, Option 2D.2: The unification of Germany, c1840–71 - 4 Prussia and the Klein- deutschland solution, 1866–71 covers 4 specification points, including Prussia’s role in Germany, 1866–67; the Treaty… and Napoleon III and Bismarck; significance of the….
Read the full explanation
Open a point below for its explanation and revision guidance.
Prussia’s role in Germany, 1866–67; the Treaty of Prague; the annexation of north German states; the North German Confederation; Prussia’s relationship with south German states; creation of the Zollparlament; Bismarck and the National Liberals.
After the 1866 Austro-Prussian War, Prussia became the dominant German power. The Treaty of Prague (August 1866) excluded Austria from German affairs, dissolved the German Confederation, and allowed Prussia to annex several north German states. Prussia then formed the North German Confederation (1867), a federal state under Prussian leadership. Relations with south German states were managed through military alliances and the Zollparlament (1868), which brought them into economic cooperation. Bismarck worked with the National Liberals to secure constitutional and legal unity, using their support to pass key legislation. This period established the Kleindeutschland solution, excluding Austria, and set the stage for further unification.
Prussia’s relations with France, 1866–70: Napoleon III and Bismarck; significance of the Luxemburg Crisis, the Hohenzollern candidature and the Ems Telegram; outbreak of war; significance of the international situation 1870.
After 1866, Franco-Prussian tensions grew. Napoleon III feared a powerful Prussia and sought compensation for French neutrality. The Luxemburg Crisis (1867) saw Bismarck block French acquisition of Luxemburg, humiliating France. In 1870, the Hohenzollern candidature for the Spanish throne provoked French protests; Bismarck’s editing of the Ems Telegram made it appear that both sides had been insulted, leading France to declare war. The international situation favoured Prussia: Britain and Russia remained neutral, and south German states joined Prussia due to treaties. The war led to the defeat of France and the creation of the German Empire in 1871.
The significance of the Franco-Prussian War, including increased support for German nationalism, strengthening of Bismarck’s position and the creation of a German Empire; the significance of the Treaty of Frankfurt 1871.
The Franco-Prussian War (1870–71) was the final stage of German unification. Its significance lies in three linked outcomes. First, it increased support for German nationalism: the war against a foreign enemy rallied the south German states to Prussia’s side, overcoming earlier reluctance and making unity popular. Second, it strengthened Bismarck’s position: his diplomacy isolated France, and victory made him indispensable to the new order. Third, it created a German Empire: the defeat of France allowed the proclamation of the Empire at Versailles in January 1871, with Wilhelm I as Kaiser. The Treaty of Frankfurt (May 1871) confirmed this new balance: France ceded Alsace-Lorraine, paid an indemnity, and accepted German unification. Together, these outcomes show how war and treaty turned Prussian leadership into a German Empire.
Reasons for Prussia’s success, including the role of Bismarck, military strength, economic factors, German nationalism and the international situation.
Prussia’s success in unifying Germany rested on several interlocking reasons. Bismarck’s role was central: his diplomacy isolated Austria and France, and his willingness to use war served Prussian interests. Military strength mattered: reforms and efficient organisation gave Prussia battlefield advantages. Economic factors were also important: the Zollverein and industrial growth tied German states to Prussia and funded its army. German nationalism provided popular pressure for unity, though it was often used by Prussia rather than controlled by it. The international situation helped: rival powers were distracted or neutral, allowing Prussia to act without a major coalition against it. Together, these reasons explain why Prussia, not Austria, led the Klein-deutschland solution by 1871.
Your focus
- Students can describe the key terms of the Treaty of Prague and their impact on Prussia’s role in Germany.
- Students can explain how the North German Confederation was established and its significance for unification.
- Students can analyse Prussia’s relationship with south German states and the role of the Zollparlament in fostering unity.
Show all 12 objectives
- Students can describe the key events in Franco-Prussian relations from 1866 to 1870 and their significance.
- Students can explain how Bismarck manipulated the Hohenzollern candidature and the Ems Telegram to provoke France.
- Students can assess the international situation in 1870 and its impact on the outbreak of the Franco-Prussian War.
- Explain how the Franco-Prussian War increased support for German nationalism.
- Explain how the war strengthened Bismarck’s position.
- Explain how the war and the Treaty of Frankfurt contributed to the creation of a German Empire.
- Explain the role of Bismarck in Prussia’s success.
- Explain how military and economic factors contributed to Prussia’s success.
- Explain how German nationalism and the international situation helped Prussia.
Paper 2, Option 2D.2: The unification of Germany, c1840–71 - 4 Prussia and the Klein- deutschland solution, 1866–71 exam tips
Marking Points
- Explains how the Treaty of Prague (1866) excluded Austria from German affairs and dissolved the German Confederation, enabling Prussian dominance.
- Describes the annexation of north German states such as Hanover, Hesse-Kassel, Nassau, and Schleswig-Holstein, and their incorporation into Prussia.
- Outlines the creation of the North German Confederation (1867) under Prussian leadership, with a constitution designed by Bismarck.
- Analyses Prussia’s relationship with south German states, including military alliances and the Zollparlament, and how Bismarck managed these ties.
- Assesses Bismarck’s collaboration with the National Liberals to achieve legal and economic unity, and the significance of this for unification.
- Explains the deterioration of Franco-Prussian relations after 1866, including Napoleon III’s fears and Bismarck’s aims.
- Describes the Luxemburg Crisis (1867) and its significance in heightening tensions and humiliating France.
- Analyses the Hohenzollern candidature (1870) and how Bismarck used it to provoke France.
- Explains the Ems Telegram and how Bismarck’s editing made war more likely.
- Assesses the international situation in 1870, including the neutrality of other powers and the role of south German states, leading to the outbreak of war.
- Explains how the war increased support for German nationalism, for example by provoking a patriotic response in the south German states and overcoming particularist resistance.
- Explains how the war strengthened Bismarck’s position, for example by allowing him to control diplomacy, isolate France, and present himself as the architect of victory.
- Explains how the war led to the creation of a German Empire, for example through the proclamation at Versailles in January 1871 and the acceptance of Wilhelm I as Kaiser.
- Explains the significance of the Treaty of Frankfurt 1871, for example the cession of Alsace-Lorraine, the payment of an indemnity, and the confirmation of German unification.
- Links the three outcomes together, showing how military victory, political leadership and territorial settlement reinforced each other.
- Explains Bismarck’s role, for example through diplomacy, manipulation of international crises, and readiness to use war.
- Explains military strength, for example through army reforms, organisation, and technological or tactical advantages.
- Explains economic factors, for example the Zollverein, industrial growth, and the financial base for military power.
- Explains German nationalism, for example popular support for unity and its use by Prussia to justify leadership.
- Explains the international situation, for example the neutrality or distraction of other powers and the isolation of Austria and France.
Examiner Tips
- 💡Use specific dates and terms (e.g., Treaty of Prague, North German Confederation, Zollparlament) to show precise knowledge.
- 💡Link each development to the broader question of how Prussia achieved dominance and how it affected south German states.
- 💡When discussing Bismarck and the National Liberals, explain their mutual interests and the limits of their cooperation.
- 💡Use precise dates and names (e.g., Luxemburg Crisis 1867, Ems Telegram 1870) to demonstrate detailed knowledge.
- 💡Explain the significance of each event in escalating tensions, rather than just describing them.
- 💡Link the international situation to the outbreak of war, showing how Prussia isolated France.
- 💡Use the three outcomes as a structure: nationalism, Bismarck’s position, and the Empire, then add the Treaty of Frankfurt as the settlement that confirmed them.
- 💡Support each point with specific evidence, such as the proclamation at Versailles or the terms of the Treaty of Frankfurt.
- 💡Explain significance rather than just describing events: say why each outcome mattered for unification and for the future.
- 💡Organise your answer around the named reasons, but show how they connected to each other.
- 💡Use specific examples, such as the Zollverein, army reforms, or diplomatic isolation of Austria and France.
- 💡Explain why each reason mattered for Prussia’s success, not just what happened.
Common Mistakes
- Error: stating that the Treaty of Prague annexed south German states. Correction: the treaty excluded Austria and allowed Prussia to annex only certain north German states; south German states remained independent but allied.
- Error: claiming the North German Confederation included south German states. Correction: it was a north German federal state; south German states were linked by treaties and the Zollparlament but not members.
- Error: describing the Zollparlament as a fully sovereign parliament. Correction: it was an economic parliament with limited powers, not a government for all Germany.
- Error: stating that the Ems Telegram was a declaration of war. Correction: it was a diplomatic dispatch edited by Bismarck to provoke France; France declared war.
- Error: claiming that Britain supported France in 1870. Correction: Britain remained neutral, as did Russia, which favoured Prussia.
- Error: saying the Luxemburg Crisis led directly to war. Correction: it was a diplomatic defeat for France but war came later over the Hohenzollern candidature.
- Treating the war as only a military event and ignoring its political consequences; correction: explain how it changed nationalist sentiment, Bismarck’s authority and the creation of the Empire.
- Assuming the Treaty of Frankfurt simply ended the war without lasting significance; correction: explain how its terms affected France, Germany and future relations.
- Confusing the proclamation of the German Empire with the Treaty of Frankfurt; correction: distinguish the political creation of the Empire in January 1871 from the formal peace settlement in May 1871.
- Treating Bismarck as the only reason for success; correction: explain how military, economic, nationalist and international factors also contributed.
- Assuming German nationalism was always controlled by Bismarck; correction: recognise popular nationalist pressure as a factor that Prussia could use but not fully control.
- Ignoring the international situation; correction: explain how the attitudes of other powers allowed Prussia to act.