Child Psychology Revision Notes
Subject: Psychology | Level: A-Level | Exam Board: OCR
Master OCR A-Level Child Psychology by diving into the six core studies that define the course. This guide breaks down complex theories from Gibson & Walk's Visual Cliff to Wood et al.'s Scaffolding, providing the specific knowledge and evaluation skills needed to excel in Component 3.
Revision Notes & Key Concepts
Revision Podcast Transcript
OCR A-Level Psychology: Child Psychology Study Podcast. Duration: Approximately 10 minutes. Voice: Female, warm, conversational, enthusiastic tutor tone. INTRO: Hello and welcome! I'm so glad you've pressed play on this one, because Child Psychology is genuinely one of the most fascinating areas of the entire OCR A-Level specification. In this episode, we're going to cover everything you need to know for Component 3. We'll walk through the core concepts and all six key studies, then I'll give you my top exam tips and flag the most common mistakes I see candidates make. After that, we'll do a quick-fire recall quiz to test your memory, and I'll wrap up with a punchy summary you can use as a last-minute revision tool. CORE CONCEPTS: Right, let's start with the big picture. Child Psychology in OCR A-Level is all about how children develop cognitively, socially, linguistically, and perceptually. The exam board wants you to understand both the background theories AND the specific key research studies. Examiners will specify which one they want. So let's run through the six key studies. Memorise these using G-V-B-S-C-W: Great Vets Build Strong Caring Worlds. Gibson, Van Leeuwen, Bandura, Samuel, Curtiss, Wood. Gibson and Walk, 1960. The Visual Cliff study. 36 infants aged 6-14 months. 27 out of 36 refused to cross the deep side. Supports the nativist, nature position. Van Leeuwen et al., 2004. Cross-cultural attachment study. Used the Strange Situation procedure. Found both universal patterns AND cultural variation. Supports an interactionist view. Bandura, Ross and Ross, 1961. The Bobo Doll study. 72 children aged 3-6. Children who observed an aggressive model showed significantly more imitative aggression. Supports Social Learning Theory and the nurture side. Samuel and Bryant, 1983. A critique of Piaget's conservation tasks. 252 children aged 5 to 8.5. Asking the question only once led to significantly fewer errors. Piaget underestimated children's abilities. Curtiss, 1977. The case study of Genie. Discovered at age 13 after extreme deprivation. Never fully acquired grammatical language. Supports the Critical Period Hypothesis. Always mention ethics. Wood, Bruner and Ross, 1976. The Scaffolding study. 30 children aged 3-5. Most effective tutors used contingent instruction. Demonstrates Vygotsky's ZPD in action. EXAM TIPS: Tip one: Always use AMRC. Aim, Method, Results, Conclusions. Tip two: Quote specific data. 27 out of 36. 72 children aged 3-6. Tip three: Go beyond generic evaluation. Explain the implication. Tip four: Use the Issues and Debates framework. Tip five: For 15-mark essays, use PEEL. Tip six: Allocate 15 minutes for the 10-mark question and 25 minutes for the 15-mark question. Common mistakes: Confusing Wood et al. with Piaget. Describing when you should be evaluating. Ignoring the background theory. QUIZ: Question one: How many infants in Gibson and Walk, and how many refused? Answer: 36 infants, 27 refused. Question two: What is the ZPD? Answer: The gap between what a child can do alone and what they can achieve with expert guidance. Question three: What was Samuel and Bryant's key methodological change? Answer: They asked the question only once. Question four: Name the six studies. Answer: Gibson, Van Leeuwen, Bandura, Samuel, Curtiss, Wood. Question five: What does AMRC stand for? Answer: Aim, Method, Results, Conclusions. SUMMARY: Know all six studies by AMRC with specific data. Understand background theories separately from key research. Anchor every evaluation point to an Issue or Debate. Use PEEL for essays. Quote specific numbers. You've got this. Good luck.
Key Terms & Definitions
- Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD)
- The gap between what a learner can achieve independently and what they can achieve with guidance from a more knowledgeable other.
- Scaffolding
- The process of providing tailored, temporary support to a learner by a more knowledgeable other, which is gradually withdrawn as the learner becomes more competent.
- Nativist
- A theoretical perspective that argues certain skills or abilities are 'native' or hard-wired into the brain at birth.
- Ecological Validity
- The extent to which the findings of a research study can be generalized to real-life settings.
- Contingent Instruction
- A form of tutoring where the level of help given is responsive to the learner's performance, increasing when they struggle and decreasing when they succeed.
- Critical Period Hypothesis
- The theory (Lenneberg, 1967) that language must be acquired during a specific biologically-determined window of time (birth to puberty), after which full language acquisition is no longer possible.
- Conservation
- The understanding that the quantity of a substance remains the same even when its appearance changes. Piaget argued children in the pre-operational stage cannot conserve.
- Social Learning Theory
- Bandura's theory that behaviour is learned through observation, imitation, and vicarious reinforcement of models in the social environment.
Worked Examples
Worked Example
Question: Assess the usefulness of Gibson and Walk's (1960) study for understanding perceptual development in children. (15 marks)
Solution: **Introduction**: Gibson and Walk's (1960) study of the visual cliff was highly useful in providing empirical evidence for the nativist view of perception, suggesting that depth perception is an innate ability. However, its usefulness is limited by methodological issues and the difficulty of separating innate from learned behaviours. This essay will assess its contributions and limitations. **Point 1: Usefulness in Supporting Nativism**: The study is extremely useful for providing strong evidence for the nature side of the nature-nurture debate. The key finding that 27 out of 36 infants refused to cross the 'deep' side, despite encouragement from their mothers, demonstrates an early ability to perceive depth and avoid a potential hazard. This was groundbreaking because it challenged the empiricist view that such abilities are solely learned through experience. Credit is given for explaining *why* this supports nativism. **Point 2: Usefulness of the Methodology**: The creation of the visual cliff apparatus was a novel and useful method for testing perception in pre-verbal infants. It allowed researchers to infer perceptual abilities from behaviour (i.e., crawling). This methodology has been highly influential and adapted for use with various species, demonstrating its utility as a research tool. Marks are awarded for showing how the method enabled the investigation. **Counter-Argument / Limitation 1: Age of Participants**: However, the usefulness of the study is limited by the age of the participants. The infants were already 6-14 months old. By this age, they have had significant motor experience, including crawling and potentially falling. This experience could have taught them to be wary of heights, meaning the avoidance behaviour may be a result of nurture, not nature. Therefore, the study cannot definitively conclude that depth perception is purely innate, which reduces its usefulness as conclusive proof. **Counter-Argument / Limitation 2: Ecological Validity**: Furthermore, the study's usefulness can be questioned on grounds of ecological validity. The artificial lab setting and the unusual apparatus are unlike any environment an infant would typically encounter. The 'cliff' is an illusion, and the infants' behaviour in this context may not accurately reflect their perceptual abilities in the real world. This limits the generalisability of the findings. **Conclusion**: In conclusion, Gibson and Walk's study is highly useful as a foundational piece of research that provided strong, early evidence for innate perceptual abilities and introduced a valuable new methodology. However, its usefulness is ultimately limited by the confounding variable of experience in its sample and its low ecological validity. It is a vital starting point for the debate, not the final word.
Worked Example
Question: Using your knowledge of psychology, explain how a teacher could use the concept of scaffolding to help a student learn a new mathematical skill. (10 marks)
Solution: **Introduction**: Scaffolding, a concept developed from Vygotsky's theories and demonstrated by Wood et al. (1976), involves a more knowledgeable other providing temporary support to a learner to help them master a task within their Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). A teacher can apply this to teaching a new mathematical skill in several stages. **Application 1: Demonstration and Modelling**: Initially, the teacher would act as the expert, demonstrating how to solve a problem step-by-step. For example, when teaching long division, the teacher would work through a problem on the board, verbalising their thought process. This is the first level of the scaffold, as seen in Wood et al.'s study where tutors would show the child how to join blocks. **Application 2: Guided Practice and Prompts**: Next, the teacher would provide a new problem and guide the student through it. They would not give the answer but would provide prompts and cues. For instance, if the student gets stuck, the teacher might ask, 'What is the next step after you've multiplied the numbers?' This is contingent support, adjusting help based on the student's needs, which Wood et al. found to be the most effective strategy. **Application 3: Reducing Support (Fading)**: As the student becomes more competent, the teacher gradually withdraws support — a process known as fading. They might start by only providing help on the most difficult steps or encouraging the student to refer to a worked example instead of asking for direct help. This empowers the student to take on more responsibility for their learning. **Application 4: Independent Practice**: Finally, the scaffold is removed entirely. The student is now able to complete the long division problems independently. They have successfully crossed their ZPD and acquired the new skill. The teacher's role is now to confirm the student's mastery and provide new challenges.
Worked Example
Question: Describe and evaluate the case study of Genie (Curtiss, 1977). (15 marks)
Solution: **Description (AO1)**: Curtiss (1977) conducted a longitudinal case study of Genie, a girl discovered in 1970 at the age of 13 after years of extreme social isolation and physical abuse. Genie had been confined to a small room and had received virtually no linguistic input during her childhood. Curtiss's aim was to document Genie's language development following her rescue, in order to test the Critical Period Hypothesis (Lenneberg, 1967), which proposes that language must be acquired before puberty or the capacity for full language acquisition is permanently impaired. Despite intensive support and language teaching, Genie was able to acquire some vocabulary but never developed full grammatical competence. Her speech remained telegraphic, lacking complex syntactic structures. Curtiss concluded that Genie's case provided support for the Critical Period Hypothesis. **Evaluation (AO3) - Point 1: Ethics**: A major limitation of this study is the significant ethical issues it raises. Genie was a vulnerable individual who had already suffered severe abuse. She could not give informed consent to participate in the research. Furthermore, there are concerns that the researchers' motivations may have been influenced by academic ambition, potentially causing Genie additional psychological harm. This means the study fails to meet modern ethical guidelines on the protection of participants, which limits the extent to which we should trust its findings. **Evaluation (AO3) - Point 2: Confounding Variables**: A further limitation is the presence of confounding variables. Genie's inability to acquire full language could be attributed to the severe psychological trauma and malnutrition she experienced, rather than the absence of language input during the critical period. It is therefore impossible to isolate the effect of language deprivation from the effects of general neglect, which means the study cannot provide unambiguous support for the Critical Period Hypothesis. **Evaluation (AO3) - Point 3: Unique Scientific Value**: Despite its limitations, the study has unique scientific value. It would be entirely unethical to deliberately deprive a child of language to test the hypothesis in a controlled experiment. Genie's case therefore provided a rare natural experiment that offered insights impossible to obtain any other way. This means the study remains a significant, if flawed, contribution to our understanding of language acquisition.
Practice Questions
Question: Describe the findings and conclusions of Bandura, Ross and Ross's (1961) study into the imitation of aggression. (8 marks)
Answer:
Question: Explain what is meant by the 'Zone of Proximal Development'. Use an example from Wood et al. (1976) to support your answer. (4 marks)
Answer:
Question: Discuss the extent to which psychology supports the view that development is determined by nature. (15 marks)
Answer:
Question: Outline one ethical issue raised by Curtiss's (1977) study of Genie and explain how it affects the conclusions we can draw. (4 marks)
Answer:
Question: Explain how Samuel and Bryant's (1983) study challenged Piaget's theory of conservation. (6 marks)
Answer:
